This deviant's full pageview
graph is unavailable.
Member
I am a Deviously Deviant
Jennifer
18/Female/United States
Why I Am Here
- To herd llamas
- To show my artwork to the world
- To appreciate art
Last Visit: 11 hours ago
Fracture
Art Zone
Personal Zone
Misc. Zone
This is the place where you can personalize your profile!
But, how?
By moving, adding and personalizing widgets.
You can drag and drop to rearrange.
You can edit widgets to customize them.
The left side has widgets you can add!
Some widgets you can only access when you get a premium membership.
Some widgets have options that are only available when you get a premium membership.
We've split the page into zones!
Certain widgets can only be added to certain zones.
"Why," you ask? Because we want profile pages to have freedom of customization, but also to have some consistency. This way, when anyone visits a deviant, they know they can always find the art in the top left, and personal info in the top right.
Don't forget, restraints can bring out the creativity in you!
Now go forth and astound us all with your devious profiles!
I came across a comment you made about fetuses not being alive or feeling... how can you say that? Premature babies can live from 7 months, and oftentimes a "complication" to an abortion is "fetus life"! And a fetus CAN feel... there's proof: [link]
Your opinion is still just that, but ignorance is something I have a hard time tolerating. In some cases, it is the mother's choice, but most of the time, abortion is treated as a convenience, and taking life from an unborn child is just wrong.
I'm talking about a fetus on which a proper abortion is performed. It is not a living being capable of feeling at that time. I don't agree with late abortions, and I never will. But I will always support abortion, because the alternative is so much worse. While the fetus is still just that, a part of the woman's body and nothing more, than it is a woman's choice to get rid of it. I've never condoned abortions after a fetus has really begun developing a life. And yes, I realize that it has become a convenience for women who can't understand keeping their legs closed. And I do feel that there are not enough restrictions on abortion and who can have one.
--
For the strength of the Wolf is the Pack and the strength of the Pack is the Wolf.
That is a highly biased video, which I would be hesitant to use in making a point. It is very strange that you followed this user all the way to their page in an attempt to correct them. I do not like abortion any more than you do, but please do not level the belief that choice is an important freedom to retain to be pure ignorance.
I said the fetus, not the developing child. A proper abortion is performed BEFORE the fetus begins developing into a child and before it begins taking on the characteristics of life. Do not mistake me for a cruel being. It irks me to no end when people compare a living, feeling, breathing infant to a fetus. And that is the distinction I was making. A fetus does not have a life. It is nothing more than cells that have not yet grown into a life. I do not agree with abortion being treated as a convenience, as a simple way out of a stupid mistake. However, I do agree with the woman's choice to be able to abort if she wishes. I do support a woman aborting a pregnancy by rape. I do support a woman aborting a pregnancy if it threatens to kill her.
--
For the strength of the Wolf is the Pack and the strength of the Pack is the Wolf.
7 months? That's an awfully long time to wait to have an abortion, the vast majority of abortions are done long, long before then.
Plus, they don't even have nervous systems until after about 2 months, so how could they feel pain at all before then? Please, rely on something other than youtube for your sources.
Youtube isn't a primary source, it just occasionally serves as a linkage institution; and plenty of abortions happen during the second and third trimester. Many women don't realize their pregnant until a few months have gone by, and as you said, 2 months is all it takes to be able to feel pain. If you're going to tell me that the "vast majority" of abortions happen before 2 months, then you're the one who needs new sources. The bottom line is that women already have a choice, they can choose to use birth control or just keep it in their pants. Besides the rare occasion that the abortion has to be done to save the mother, or the woman was raped or something, there is absolutely no excuse to kill a healthy child before it even has a chance at life.
The silent scream is pretty obviously just a biased propaganda film documenting THIRD TRIMESTER abortions, which aren't usually done unless the mother needs one to save her own life.
Look up the statistics regarding abortion, most of them occur when the zygote looks like this: [link]
If you're really going to tell me that has more rights than a woman, please come back and join the realm of reality.
"and as you said, 2 months is all it takes to be able to feel pain."
That is NOT what I said. I said that the zygote cannot possibly feel pain before those 2 months have passed. However, it's doubtful that they are even sentient then.
"If you're going to tell me that the "vast majority" of abortions happen before 2 months, then you're the one who needs new sources"
Are you telling me a propaganda film on youtube is more reliable than a health website?
Look at the pie graph: 61% of abortions take place before 9 weeks. The kind of abortions that are probably depicted in the silent scream make up only ONE percent!
"The bottom line is that women already have a choice, they can choose to use birth control or just keep it in their pants."
That doesn't apply when the woman is raped. Secondly, having to carry a baby for 9 months is not suitable punishment for not "keeping it in their pants."
"Besides the rare occasion that the abortion has to be done to save the mother, or the woman was raped or something, there is absolutely no excuse to kill a healthy child before it even has a chance at life."
Excuse me? Are you really saying that a woman who was raped should be forced to carry it against her will? And that she should be forced to die for it if need be? Are you seriously suggesting that a clump of cells has MORE rights than a fully sentient human being?
So, regarding the rape situation...if you have two healthy kidneys, should people be forced to donate one of them to one of the many sick and dying people in need of one right now? If not, then why the hell should women have to do the same for zygotes after they had been raped?
Please, reply to me when you re-join humanity and realize that we are morally obligated to sentient human beings, we are not morally obligated to sub-sentient clumps of DNA.
--
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
--
For the strength of the Wolf is the Pack and the strength of the Pack is the Wolf.
--
There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full - Henry Kissinger
[link]
Your opinion is still just that, but ignorance is something I have a hard time tolerating. In some cases, it is the mother's choice, but most of the time, abortion is treated as a convenience, and taking life from an unborn child is just wrong.
--
perhaps, Silence is the loudest of all.
I don't agree with late abortions, and I never will. But I will always support abortion, because the alternative is so much worse.
While the fetus is still just that, a part of the woman's body and nothing more, than it is a woman's choice to get rid of it. I've never condoned abortions after a fetus has really begun developing a life.
And yes, I realize that it has become a convenience for women who can't understand keeping their legs closed. And I do feel that there are not enough restrictions on abortion and who can have one.
--
For the strength of the Wolf is the Pack and the strength of the Pack is the Wolf.
--
You can't keep a good penis down.
[link] Why is this so funny to me?
It irks me to no end when people compare a living, feeling, breathing infant to a fetus. And that is the distinction I was making.
A fetus does not have a life. It is nothing more than cells that have not yet grown into a life.
I do not agree with abortion being treated as a convenience, as a simple way out of a stupid mistake. However, I do agree with the woman's choice to be able to abort if she wishes. I do support a woman aborting a pregnancy by rape. I do support a woman aborting a pregnancy if it threatens to kill her.
--
For the strength of the Wolf is the Pack and the strength of the Pack is the Wolf.
Plus, they don't even have nervous systems until after about 2 months, so how could they feel pain at all before then? Please, rely on something other than youtube for your sources.
--
Moved. New account: [link]
--
perhaps, Silence is the loudest of all.
Look up the statistics regarding abortion, most of them occur when the zygote looks like this: [link]
If you're really going to tell me that has more rights than a woman, please come back and join the realm of reality.
"and as you said, 2 months is all it takes to be able to feel pain."
That is NOT what I said. I said that the zygote cannot possibly feel pain before those 2 months have passed. However, it's doubtful that they are even sentient then.
"If you're going to tell me that the "vast majority" of abortions happen before 2 months, then you're the one who needs new sources"
[link]
Are you telling me a propaganda film on youtube is more reliable than a health website?
Look at the pie graph: 61% of abortions take place before 9 weeks. The kind of abortions that are probably depicted in the silent scream make up only ONE percent!
"The bottom line is that women already have a choice, they can choose to use birth control or just keep it in their pants."
That doesn't apply when the woman is raped. Secondly, having to carry a baby for 9 months is not suitable punishment for not "keeping it in their pants."
"Besides the rare occasion that the abortion has to be done to save the mother, or the woman was raped or something, there is absolutely no excuse to kill a healthy child before it even has a chance at life."
Excuse me? Are you really saying that a woman who was raped should be forced to carry it against her will? And that she should be forced to die for it if need be? Are you seriously suggesting that a clump of cells has MORE rights than a fully sentient human being?
So, regarding the rape situation...if you have two healthy kidneys, should people be forced to donate one of them to one of the many sick and dying people in need of one right now? If not, then why the hell should women have to do the same for zygotes after they had been raped?
Please, reply to me when you re-join humanity and realize that we are morally obligated to sentient human beings, we are not morally obligated to sub-sentient clumps of DNA.
--
Moved. New account: [link]
Previous Page123Next Page